| Archive for +=TP=+ teamplay.myfreeforum.org +=TP=+ +=TP=+ Welcome to the Teamplay Clan forum pages +=TP=+ |
| +=TP=+wombat8 |
Battlefield 3!I know it's still REALLY early to start thinking about the next Battlefield but I've been searching the web for all the info (very little at the moment) about most sites seem to have no idea, but about 5 sites all agreed with the things on here http://planetbattlefield.gamespy....etail&id=5&comment_page=2it looks like it's WWII again- great...   Yaaaawn...
|
||
| +=TP=+ SirJxter |
hope they'll create a medieval first person "shooter" one day, with muskets and that shit  !
|
||
| +=TP=+ Convilement |
With the crap that's gone on with battlefield i doubt anyone would buy Another Battlefield game. | ||
| +=TP=+Sire_eriS |
don't care, which ever game gives me good team/squad based action gets my vote/cash. so if its bf3-the cowboy + indian or quack 5 duck wars i'm not bovered 
|
||
| +=TP=+Seargent Stu(admin) |
if they get rid of the shitty artillery and commander, and concentrate on the squad play, i will be there, really like the look of COD3 at the moment as it reminds me of my favourite BF game. | ||
| +=TP=+Hamelin |
I think it's called Enemy Territory: Quake Wars and I think it looks like it will be really crap too
|
||
| lt.roko |
they must be reely shocked by the turn out of buyers for 2142, wood be crap whatever they do move on diff game nobs at EA 
|
||
| +=TP=+wombat8 |
That's exactly what people said about 2142 after BF2- but look what happened
|
||
| lt.roko |
hte only reason i tfink ppl got 2142 cos it was futaristic based war, they cant release a new bf with same style of either old 1921 setting, nor 2142 future stuff
|
||
| +=TP=+ me321 |
but they can do of the present time he with normal stuff....
like kinds with weapons in irak and so on
ow but that ain't really normal he 
|
||
| +=TP=+ SirJxter |
modern warfare isn't suited for gaming
tanks are aiming with the help of a computer, helicopters are aiming with the help of a computer, rockets are aiming with a computer. It's not about skill anymore, you just have to learn how the computer works... |
||
| +=TP=+Deadly_Dave(admin) |
uummmmmmm what do you guys think battlefield 2 was all about then
|
||
| Guest |
omg not ww2 again..maybe crossbows and stuff with catapults or trebuchet instead of tanks
|
||
| lt.roko |
Lol Dave was gonna ask what Bf2 they were talking bout
|
||
| +=TP=+Wombateater |
i think they need to think of something new because they have done:-
-WW2 -vietnam -modern warfare -future warfare so i think they need to make it totaly different to finish the series but not make it boring with muskets that take 5 mins to reload! I realy dont think they should do WW2 because so many other people are doing them, the biggest proberly Call of Duty |
||
| +=TP=+Sire_eriS |
they wont do muskets- completly different style of warfare
(imagine two 32 player squads forming up and volley shooting -it just aint going to work) my money is on a veitnam remake. |
||
| lt.roko |
i aint putng ne money down for no more bf related games till they release a decent one (like f**k that will eva happen ) 
|
||
| +=TP=+wombat8 |
What about a ww1 or faulklands game? It could start a new craze like 1942 did. | ||
| +=TP=+Holde |
aye ww1 would be great maybe a collecters etd with free trench rot oooh could have lots of germans running around with those pointed helmets and caverly not to mention those big feck off tanks just please no commanders and aerial strikes etc etc
|
||
| +=TP=+ Blade |
Ok, so about the poll, before EA even ----THINKS---- about making a new game they need to fix the stuff in BF2/2142 before the even touch the subject of a new game, so if it were to come out in the near future my answer wouldnt be No, Sick of WWII games, it would be, No, not untill you lazy developers fix the current games youve released
|
||